![]() 33 1 All parties have consented to jurisdiction before a United States Magistrate Judge therefore the Court has the authority to decide dispositive motions, and to eventually enter final judgment. For the reasons that follow, the District’s motion for summary judgment ECF No. The motions are fully briefed and ripe for consideration. Before the Court for consideration are the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment. The Court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Defendants filed a counterclaim seeking a reversal of a portion of the Hearing Officer’s order with respect to the Hearing Officer’s finding related to the Defendants’ Rehabilitation Act of 1973 claim. (collectively “Parents”) seeking reversal of a portion of the Hearing Officer’s order in connection with the Student’s special education services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Peters Township School District (the “District”) initiated this civil action against B.B. B., HIS PARENT Defendants, 2:20-CV-01576-CRE MEMORANDUM OPINION1 CYNTHIA REED EDDY, Chief United States Magistrate Judge. 47 Case 2:20-cv-01576-CRE Document 47 Filed 06/30/22 of 33 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA PITTSBURGH ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) PETERS TOWNSHIP SCHOOL DISTRICT, Plaintiff, vs.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |